← All speakers

Bio, Work & Ideas

Amir Haghighat

Conference affiliation: Baseten · 2025

Amir Haghighat is the co-founder and chief technology officer of Baseten, which builds infrastructure for running AI models in production. His specialty is production model inference: making specialized models fast, reliable, secure, and economical enough for enterprise applications.

From fraud detection to Baseten

Haghighat was head of engineering at Gumroad before working in engineering at Clover Health. At Gumroad, future Baseten co-founders Tuhin Srivastava and Phil Howes trained a credit-card-fraud classifier, then discovered that serving it reliably inside a production application was harder than developing the model itself.

In 2019, Haghighat founded Baseten with Srivastava, Howes, and Pankaj Gupta. As generative AI and openly available models proliferated, the company focused on the infrastructure needed to deploy, optimize, scale, and monitor them. Haghighat traces Baseten’s evolution toward generative AI infrastructure to that original insight: useful models create another demanding engineering problem when they encounter real users.

By February 2026, Baseten’s founders had announced a $300 million Series E at a $5 billion valuation.

  • Specialized models create enterprise advantage. Haghighat argues that organizations differentiate themselves by combining models with proprietary data. Health insurers, for example, can use accumulated labeled records to extract diagnoses, prescriptions, and procedure codes; specialized transcription systems can better recognize clinical terminology. These applications can outperform general-purpose APIs on narrow, consequential tasks.
  • Latency determines whether AI feels usable. Voice applications need rapid first-token and first-sentence responses, while shared inference services often prioritize throughput. Haghighat’s co-authored analysis of GPT OSS 120B optimization details the tradeoffs among inference frameworks, hardware compatibility, tensor parallelism, cache-aware routing, and speculative decoding.
  • Agent economics depend on the whole workload. A single user action can trigger many model requests, overwhelming savings from falling token prices. Haghighat emphasizes compute utilization, deployment topology, and application-level unit economics when evaluating whether dedicated inference infrastructure beats per-token pricing.
  • Reliable inference requires an operational system. Running an open model with vLLM or SGLang does not resolve hardware failures, traffic spikes, observability, enterprise controls, or tail latency. Haghighat highlights prefix caching, fast scaling, and recovery mechanisms for mission-critical workloads, alongside private model deployments and multi-cloud capacity management.

Following Parsed’s integration into Baseten, Haghighat and his colleagues extended that vision to connect inference, post-training, and continuous improvement from production data.

Read the topics behind these talks

1 conference talk

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

Enterprise teams turn to open models when task quality, interactive latency and agent costs strain closed APIs—but owning the model also creates a production infrastructure obligation.

  • What does enterprise adoption actually mean?
    0:33 ↗
  • From experimentation to production
    3:09 ↗
  • The objections that were not driving the change
    5:14 ↗
  • Enterprise data can improve a narrow task
    6:53 ↗
  • Voice applications change the serving objective
    8:17 ↗
  • Agentic workloads reopen the cost question
    9:07 ↗
  • A model, an engine and GPUs are only the starting point
    10:38 ↗
  • Latency optimization crosses the model boundary
    11:59 ↗
  • Recovery, scaling and the rest of the platform
    13:37 ↗
  • Where to draw the build-or-buy boundary
    15:27 ↗

References