← All speakers

Bio, Work & Ideas

Stefania Druga

Conference affiliation: Sakana AI · 2026

Stefania Druga is a staff research scientist at Sakana AI’s Recursive Self-Improvement Lab in Tokyo and the creator of Cognimates, an open-source platform that teaches children to program robots and train machine-learning models. Her research spans creative AI literacy, sensor-equipped scientific assistants, and memory architectures for autonomous research agents.

Druga began researching children’s interactions with intelligent technologies in 2015 at the MIT Media Lab, where she earned her master’s degree and developed Cognimates. Her 2018 MIT thesis examined how programming and training AI systems changed the understanding of 107 children across four countries.

She subsequently earned a doctorate in Creative AI Literacies at the University of Washington Information School. Her earlier work included maker-education initiatives Hackidemia and Afrimakers, a research fellowship at the Weizenbaum Institute, product engineering at Fixie.ai, human-AI interaction research at Microsoft, and a principal researcher position at the University of Chicago’s Center for Applied AI Research. She worked at Google DeepMind before joining Sakana AI’s Recursive Self-Improvement Lab.

  • Creative AI literacy through making. Cognimates extends Scratch with visual programming, robotics, and custom image and text classifiers. Children can train a model to distinguish unicorns from narwhals, inspect its confidence, and improve its training examples when drawings confuse it. Building and testing these systems helps learners question the intelligence they attribute to familiar AI tools.
  • Learner agency in AI-assisted coding. Cognimates Scratch Copilot, developed with Amy J. Ko, supports brainstorming, debugging, code explanations, and image generation without taking ownership of a child’s project. An exploratory study with 18 children emphasized adjustable support, transparent limitations, and the freedom to reject suggestions. Earlier research with Nancy Otero evaluated language-model assistance for families learning Scratch.
  • Real-time AI co-scientists. Druga built a scientific assistant connecting micro:bit and Jacdac sensors, cameras, and microscopes to Gemini through React and WebUSB. Crystal-growth experiments combined live temperature and humidity measurements, microscopy, experimental protocols, and subsequent data analysis. The prototype is distinct from Google’s separate AI co-scientist system and emphasizes affordable, open laboratory hardware.
  • Ranked recall for long-running research agents. Her on-device memory experiments combine persistent traces, archival storage, vector retrieval, and decision ledgers. Evaluations on XBench and Spider 2.0 found that ranked recall improves retrieval when essential information falls outside the context window; when the complete task still fits, additional memory increases cost without improving performance. Running quantized models locally also gives researchers direct control over evaluation data, execution traces, and the tradeoffs involved in sovereign AI.

Read the topics behind these talks

4 conference talks

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

A local research-agent experiment shows when durable memory helps, why ranking matters more than simply enabling recall, and how correct evidence can still produce a wrong answer.

  • When the agent forgets the work
    0:16 ↗
  • A local model and a Mac surrounded by fans
    1:36 ↗
  • Memory is a write–manage–read loop
    3:29 ↗
  • When all the evidence already fits
    5:27 ↗
  • The answer is at step 124; the question arrives at step 500
    6:39 ↗
  • Retrieving the right memory is only half the problem
    7:49 ↗
  • Bad memory spends tokens in the wrong direction
    8:59 ↗
  • Make recall policy an evaluation target
    10:02 ↗
  • Control over the pipeline has a throughput cost
    11:26 ↗

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

A sensor board, microscope, and tracking camera turn a scientific assistant into a live observer, with experiment protocols providing the context needed to interpret what it sees.

  • What does a warming sensor board tell a science assistant?
    0:31 ↗
  • Keeping an experiment in view
    2:20 ↗
  • From data overload to competing hypotheses
    3:37 ↗
  • Bringing empirical observations into the conversation
    6:57 ↗
  • Assembling context for each message
    8:17 ↗
  • Choosing experiments from the available ingredients
    10:17 ↗
  • Recording crystal growth and comparing cooling conditions
    11:37 ↗
  • Fermentation and the education version
    14:28 ↗
  • Connecting observation to laboratory automation
    16:07 ↗
  • Using physical experiments to inform simulations
    17:06 ↗

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

From children training their own classifiers to Gemini asking questions about handwritten equations, Stefania Druga explores AI that helps learners experiment without taking over.

  • Children are already using AI. What are they learning?
    0:16 ↗
  • What children think an AI knows
    1:49 ↗
  • Make the AI something a child can change
    3:07 ↗
  • Tinkering changes the judgment of intelligence
    4:43 ↗
  • Help families create without taking over
    8:44 ↗
  • Evaluate the help, then expand the medium
    10:59 ↗
  • A drawing becomes the next science question
    13:27 ↗
  • Prompt the learner’s next action
    14:56 ↗
  • From a handwritten equation to an adaptable template
    17:27 ↗

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

From a robot playing hide-and-seek to a Scratch coding companion, Cognimates makes AI literacy a matter of building, testing, and retaining control over a project.

  • What if children built the AI tools they use?
    0:40 ↗
  • A robot, a person detector, and a missing loop
    1:54 ↗
  • Taking AI apart through play
    3:09 ↗
  • A low-confidence narwhal becomes a data question
    4:33 ↗
  • Designing a companion before building one
    8:09 ↗
  • From support tasks to Cognimates Copilot
    12:14 ↗
  • Helping without taking over
    13:55 ↗
  • Moving assistance into the programming environment
    16:21 ↗
  • From racing-game ideas to handwritten digits
    18:05 ↗
  • Starting AI literacy early
    20:25 ↗

References